Powered by Blogger.
RSS
Showing posts with label fantasy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fantasy. Show all posts

Random Thoughts: Writing Goals

            Well, first things first. I started school this morning, and I’m still cringing over the fact that I just spent a hundred dollar on a book that’s not even an inch thick and I probably won’t get thirty dollars back for. Anyway, as I was sitting bored in a class on the first day because all we did was an introduction, I got to thinking about an email I got in reaction to one of my fics, particularly the emotions it invoked. As a result, all I’ve been thinking about for most of the weekend is how I want people to react to my writing.

            When I say this, I don’t mean a character does something and it just outrages the reader. Of course I’d like it if that happened to, but what I really want is for my writing to touch people on a personal level.

            Now that doesn’t mean I want to write some deep intellectual literary story, because that’s not my goal. I write fiction. The point of fiction is to entertain and because of that, my mother was not happy when she found out I wrote fiction because she’s big on consciousness and holds the belief that there’s enough entertainment in the world.  But fiction can be more than that. And I realized that from the email I got.

            So while my primary goal is to entertain, my secondary goal will be to touch the hearts the people who read my novel. Make them really able to somehow relate to what’s going on and I mean that universally. I mean I want the reactions of the characters in the novel to mirror so closely the reactions of people in real life that people will say that this situation or issue, fantasy or no, mirrors what they went through or took them back through those emotions so that they felt the emotions coming off the page as though it were real.

            No I know, I know. Fiction is fiction and fiction is primarily to entertain when you write novel, particularly in my genre, and I understand that. But can’t fiction be entertaining and mirror the emotions of real life. Just because I write a scene or a story about a woman being pregnant or giving birth, does it mean I have to start with the dramatic “Oh no! My water broke!” or that the pregnancy has to be the funniest thing or the most dramatic experience ever? No. I hate those types of scenes, that dramatizes or makes a big deal out of things that shouldn’t be and underwhelms things that should be a little more dramatize.

            And it’s not just about the drama, it’s about capturing the emotions that come with reaction to a situation. Not just happy, sad, angry, etc. And I realized, that’s my goal. That’s the standard I shoot for when it comes to realism, even though I write fantasy.

            So yeah. Some people are going to say that’s a hard feat because money is in entertainment when it comes to writing novels. But who’s to say I can’t entertain and appeal be able to really touch on the emotions of human beings while doing so. I can do both. I know I can in fact and still appeal commercially I think.

            Anyway, just a random thought while I’m waiting for my next class. What was I thinking when I decided to take two classes with a three hour break between them. NTS: Bring workout clothes rain, hail, snow, or shine.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

How to Write a Novel: Genres Part One

So how many genres are there? A lot depending on who you ask. According to dictionary.com, a genre is “a class or category of artistic endeavor having a particular form, content, technique, or the like.” And this works because genres do have a particular form, content, or technique that distinguishes them from the other genres. So let’s talk about these genres and the difference.

The Romance
These are always about trials and tribulations of relationships whether the main coupling is already in a relationship or the writers is trying to get them there. Either way, there’s always something (the person’s uncertainties, insecurities, school, job etc.) or someone making the relationship difficult or stopping it from happening all together, and the main coupling has to overcome that.
Romance is also all about the emotions. Yes a kiss and physical intimate moments can be in them, but those are the essential for erotica romances. But it’s the emotionally intimate moments, the emotional obstacles, as well as the things that threaten to ruin the current or future relationship that make a good romance. It doesn’t have to be passionate love and feelings at first sight or it doesn’t have to be that way and they’ve been together a while. Romance is about the growth of a romantic relationship despite the obstacles. It doesn’t have to have a happy ending but it doesn’t have to. In fact, I love the bittersweet romance. Anyway, here are some conventions of the romance:

The love triangle
Forbidden love
The unlikely pair
Love at first site (I hate this one most of the time)
Hate at first site (the pair starts off hating each other)
Soul mates
Temporary heartbreak
Heartache
Internal antagonists (doubt, fear, insecurities etc…)
External antagonists (the person who doesn’t want the relationship to happen)
Beauty and the beast or geek, or jerk, etc….
Coincidental meetings
Fate and Destiny
Many more than I can name….

The Science Fiction
Notice that I don’t pair this with fantasy and I hate when people do it because there is a big difference between the two genres. Anyway, Sci-fi is typically in a futuristic world with all sorts of advancements like flying cars, devices that can teleport, aliens, ships travelling a light-speed to different galaxies, you name it. It can appear to be fantasy, and some sci-fi’s dance around that line, but the thing that distinguishes it from fantasy is that the things you see are in the realm of future scientific possibilities. This means that all of this is just high form of high science that may be possible in the real world one day through advancements in science. Star Trek is a prime example. Anyway some conventions are:

Flying cars
Travel between galaxies
Contact with aliens or non-human races
Inter-dimensional space travel
Advance brain capacity (telepathy telekinesis)
Discovery of new species
Cloning
High tech computers
Everyone has a spaceship to go visit their family who lives on another planet
Manny more than I can name

Fantasy
So if fantasy isn’t sci-fi, then what is it? Fantasy is whatever the imagination can come up with and isn’t bound by realistic scientific possibilities. Its only boundaries are the writer’s imagination. In other words, anything and I mean anything can happen. This is where myth and folklore come into play. Anything and I mean anything goes. From elves, to dragons, to vampires, to magic, witches, warlocks, sorceresses… You name it.
There’s the urban fantasy which takes place in the real world where magic or fantasy isn’t the norm but creeps up which is what I write or something like Twilight (ugh). Then there’s the rural fantasy which is a straight up fantasy world where magic is the norm even though everyone has it and they believe it exists. These can take place in medieval times where people actually believed it existed or a completely made up magical world. In rural fantasy, there can sometimes be a lacking of scientific development because magic is the norm, like in Eragon or Tamora Pierce’s novels. Then there’s the something in between which is what I call Harry Potter. It has traces of urban and rural mixed together. Some conventions are:

The hero adventure
Magic, witches and warlocks
Vampires
Elves
Mind Control
Magical Creatures
Fantastic worlds
Castles and Palaces
Anything your imagination can come up with

Wow… This article has gotten long and I’m about to go out of town, so stay tuned for Genres part two tomorrow.

You might also find helpful

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Stuck on the Romance of Harry Potter

Odd title aint it? Why in the world would I get on here talking about the romance of Harry Potter? Don't worry. It has everything to do with writing. Well, I was reading some criticism of J.K. Rowling's works and one of the things that came up was the horrible romances and the lack of development of the romances in Harry Potter. It was just like she decided in the fifth book, "Hey, my people are teenager and so Harry's going to be with Ginny and Hermione with Ron and that's it." Admittedly, it drove me batty in the book because to be quite honest, she built up more towards Harry and Hermione (they really did have more of a basis for a relationship and Ron and Hermione were always fighting and then Ron goes to get a book to tell him how not to be a git, not that I have anything against him). It got me to thinking though, why didn't she at least try to put more focus on the romances of her characters to make them more believable and fleshed out.

Well, it all goes back to the point I made to some of my fanfic readers and something that I'm ever conscious of when I write my novels. The writer has to be aware of whether their story is a romance with adventurous subplots or an adventure or fantasy or whatever with romantic subplots. Let's face it. J.K. Rowling intended it to be the latter. I have to defend J.K. Rowling on this even though the romance sucked and was unbelievably and terribly melodramatic etc. But it wasn't the romance that was important. The important part was that Harry had to defeat Voldemort and she was treading a fine line there. She could have bombed it like so many television programs and forgot about the adventure completely and let love be the thing that ended up saving them and though love did drive Harry and it played it's role, that wasn't the only thing.  So while the romance was poorly executed and got on my last nerve and Ginny just came out of nowhere for me and there was no real basis for a relationship between her and Harry, J.K. Rowling didn't really have the time to deal with that and it's a pitfall new writers or even old veteran writers don't need to fall into.

I had to deal with it in my own writing and solved the problem by making my MC oblivious to the fact that someone likes her. In fact, she's pretty much oblivious to romance because she doesn't have the time but that doesn't have to mean the people around her have to be.

A good published example of juggling romance and adventure together would be one of my favorite anime and manga of all time called Card Captor Sakura. Go look at it. It suggested so many pairing you can't even begin to count them, but the adventure never got lost in the romance however the show wouldn't have been the same without it. The emotional connection between all the characters complimented the adventure, never overcame it.

My point is that while J.K. Rowling may have just been too overly conscious of it or maybe just sucked at romances, she didn't fall into the pitfall that so many authors will and do fall into. If your story isn't a romance, then we don't need to know how every single person got together and every single person doesn't have to get together with someone. Hint at it. Give a little proof that it could happen and keep the story moving. Don't get stuck on the romance

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS